Job architecture decisions often sit quietly in the background—until they surface in audits, pay equity reviews, or internal mobility conversations. This session explores how role design, leveling, and structure choices can either reduce risk or unintentionally create compliance and equity exposure. Participants examine where job architecture decisions intersect with pay, documentation, and governance, and what HR leaders should address before issues escalate.
PARTICIPANTS WILL EXPERIENCE
• Compliance-focused job architecture scenarios
• Identification of risk signals tied to leveling and role scope
• Peer discussion on defensible structure practices
WHY THIS SESSION MATTERS
Structure decisions travel farther and last longer than expected. Addressing risk early helps organizations maintain equity, defensibility, and trust.
LEARNING OBJECTIVES
• Identify how job architecture decisions surface in compliance audits, pay equity reviews, and mobility discussions
• Evaluate where role design and leveling misalignment introduce legal, equity, or governance risk
• Distinguish between issues requiring structural redesign versus communication or process fixes
• Apply practical guardrails for maintaining defensible job architecture frameworks
SHRM recognizes MorganHR to offer 1.0 Professional Development Credit (PDC) for SHRM‑CP® or SHRM‑SCP®.